Code of Ethics for Tutors

at the Faculty of Informatics MU

This code describes the standards of tutors’ approach to their teaching and to students agreed upon by the FI MU academic community. It complements and explains the clauses of the MU Code of Ethics in the context of FI MU tutors. Its purpose is to contribute to the quality of teaching at FI, the professionalism of tutors and a fair approach to students. FI MU tutors are expected to have read the Masaryk University Code of Ethics, understand its content and abide by it.

As a tutor at FI MU:

Equality and fairness

I respect the course guarantor and other colleagues

I do not belittle my colleagues by making inappropriate remarks about their teaching methods nor the meaningfulness of the exercises being solved in class. If I disagree with something, I try to solve the problems internally. It is necessary to speak to students in a common language.

I strive for maximum consistency and objectivity

Course tutors must speak with a consistent voice. One teacher can't tolerate things that others prohibit or punish. An unfair approach demotivates everyone – those we disadvantage as well as those we favor. We can refer to this need for consistency of approach when we don't comply with a student's request.

I do not give advantages to the students in my groups

If I am responsible for preparing homework or exams, I have better knowledge than other tutors. Leaking this information to my groups would favor my students over others. This also applies to indirectly helping my students, e.g. by giving an example that is very similar to one I know will be on the exam.

I make sure that all students are treated equally

I understand that as a tutor I am there for all students regardless of their knowledge or my personal sympathies.

I try to avoid conflicts of interest

A conflict of interest is a situation where my objectivity is compromised due to personal connections to students (whether positive or negative). I actively try to prevent conflicts of interest. If I have a conflict of interest, I declare it clearly. If I know that I cannot objectively evaluate some students, I ask a colleague to evaluate them. If this is not possible, I at least ask a colleague to check that my evaluation is appropriate.

Professionalism

I strive to maximize the quality and effectiveness of my teaching

I strive for the utmost professionalism in my work. I arrive on time for my seminars and use the time during seminars efficiently. I concentrate fully on my teaching, try to teach to the best of my ability, and make sure that the seminar objectives are met to the maximum extent possible.

I accept shared responsibility for the quality of the course as a whole

I actively try to come up with suggestions for improving the course materials. If something works well, I share it with other teachers. I am not afraid to draw the course guarantor’s attention to things that are not working well.

I meet deadlines

Students who hand in their assignments on time should also receive feedback on time. I try to assess my time options in advance and avoid situations where students have to wait a long time for my assessment. If I know that I will not be able to complete an assignment on time, I will notify the course guarantor in advance so that the problem can be resolved without negative consequences for the students.

I know the limits of my knowledge. I actively work on self-education and am not afraid to admit that I don't know something

No one is born a master and no one can claim to know everything. Even less so in computer science. If a situation arises during the seminar in which I don't know the answer to a student's question, I don't try to pretend I know the answer and risk mystifying the student. Either I find the correct answer together with the students, or I admit my lack of knowledge and come back to the problem next time.

I accept constructive criticism of my work

Our common goal is the best possible education at FI. This is helped by feedback – from students in course surveys, or from colleagues after an inspection. I can distinguish criticism of my work from criticism of myself. I do not take constructive criticism as a personal attack but as an opportunity to improve.

Relationship with students

I take a positive approach to teaching and encourage intrinsic motivation

I try to emphasize why it is important to learn the subject matter and where it will be useful to the students. Intrinsic motivation is encouraged if the tutors themselves are enthusiastic. Research also shows that teacher enthusiasm leads to less cheating.

I set clear boundaries in my relation to students

I try to balance friendship and student support with a healthy distance that allows me to give students even negative evaluations. I understand that successful completion of a course depends primarily on the diligence of the students. I know that I cannot save everyone and I take care of my mental health.

I approach students with respect and trust

Naturally, students do not master the material at the beginning of the seminar. The role of the tutor is to help them build the required knowledge - patiently and without humiliation. Students need to trust the tutor so that when they ask a question, the tutor will not ridicule them but explain it to them. If they don't have that trust, they won't ask. I don't ridicule students even in their absence.

I don't judge underperforming students

It may not always be obvious why a particular student is underperforming, and it may not just be laziness - they may be going through a complicated period (serious illness in the family, mental health problems). It is possible to consult the course guarantor or the Teiresias Centre about specific situations.

Belonging to the faculty and university

I take care to protect personal or other confidential information

As a tutor, I have the trust of the university, which is reflected in my rights in the Information System. I do not abuse these rights to search for information I do not need for teaching. I carefully consider what information I may disclose to students in my groups or friends. In general, information that I cannot access as a student (non-teacher) is internal and I am not allowed to share it with anyone. This is particularly important for personal information about students, for example about their specific needs.

I accept shared responsibility for upholding the ethical standards of the Faculty

If I witness dishonest behaviour, I try to resolve the situation within my ability and competence. I report dishonest behaviour by students to the course guarantor. I also deal with suspected unethical behaviour by other colleagues appropriately and proportionately. I first try to resolve the situation directly with the person concerned, if this is not possible, with the course guarantor, or with the head of the department or the relevant vice-dean.

Teaching Lab logo

This document was created at the initiative of the lecturers of Teaching Lab, a long-standing community of student teaching assistants at the Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University.

The content of the Code was approved by the Academic Senate of the Faculty of Informatics on the 16th of February 2024.